|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Get involved today in the push to connect smarter growth with pending climate legislation. Click TAKE ACTION to learn how.
![]() The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change ![]() Meeting the growing demand for conveniently located housing in walkable, accessible, compact neighborhoods will be key to mitigating climate change. Click to find out more information about this seminal book, including information for ordering.
SGA Testifies before House Select Committee on Global Warming and Energy Independence (6/18/08) King County (WA) Executive Ron Sims before the Senate Environment and Public
Works Committee. (11/15/07)
Access detailed data on Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) from 1980-2005, broken
down state-by-state with graphs you can distribute Spreadsheet with 2003 data on state emissions by sector, showing percentage
coming from transportation.
Driving Down VMT: Curbing Climate Change with Smart Growth. 20
state-level policy recommendations to curb climate change with smart growth strategies.
![]() Read and comment on the latest posts about related topics on the SGA blog: Climate | Sustainability | Energy | "Growing Cooler" | Environment | Green News |
The United States is the second-largest emitter worldwide of the greenhouses gases that cause global warming. We released 7,782 million metric tons of greenhouse gases in 2007, a 1.4% increase from 2006. Automobile emissions have been stagnating for the past couple of years due to high gas prices and recession-inspired frugality, but emissions from the transportation sector continue to lead all sectors in carbon dioxide emissions, in large part because we have built our communities so that we have little choice but to drive from activity to activity. It is hard to envision a "solution" to climate change and energy security that does not involve drastic cuts in our transportation emissions. To date, the national discussion of energy and climate initiatives has focused almost entirely on developing more fuel-efficient vehicles or lower-carbon fuels. Experts acknowledge, however, that all foreseeable technological solutions are sure to be overwhelmed by the astronomical number of miles we all drive. The good news, though, is that we can make enormous progress simply by shaping future building so that we create more communities where people can accomplish more by driving less. Numerous studies now demonstrate that when people are given the option to live in a less automobile-dependent place, they do indeed drive less. According to the groundbreaking report Growing Cooler: The Evidence on Urban Development and Climate Change, residents of more compact neighborhoods drive 20-40 percent less on average—and less driving equals less emissions. If you combine that effort with increased investment in public transit of all shapes and sizes, we can reduce dangerous emissions even more. ![]() Vehicle Miles Traveled (VMT) and land consumption
rates are rising rapidly With much of our landscapes suited for automobile travel only, the amounts of driving necessary to navigate them increased at alarming rates. Between 1977 and 2001, the number of miles driven every year by Americans rose by 151%, at a rate almost five times faster than the population growth rate. It's no accident that VMT increased so drastically, as we continue to build and develop more areas where residents have no realistic choice but to drive long distances each day to reach their daily needs. A study published by SGA in 2002 found that the degree of sprawl was the greatest link to a high quanity of vehicle miles traveled. (Measuring Sprawl and Its Impact)
Energy consumption and our reliance on oil threatens our national interests and security The cold hard truth? We don't produce enough oil to meet our own
high demand. The United States has been producing
roughly 5 million
barrels of crude oil a day. The United States is the third-largest producer of crude oil—
but we import 58
percent of the oil we use each day
(19 million barrels in 2008.)
A sizable percentage (18%) of our imports come
from an unstable Persian Gulf region. In 2008, half of our imports came from OPEC member
nations.
It's not only us. Other developing countries
like China (which became the largest green house gas emitter in 2007 and the
largest auto market in January 2009, displacing the U.S. both times) and India (developer
of the
$2500 car) are witnessing huge spikes in the
rates of car ownership, and we will be competing with many other countries for a
limited supply of imports, becoming more expensive all the time. Domestic refineries
operate at near-capacity, and small disruptions in the
supply line can have disastrous consequences on our national economy that
requires abundant oil to survive day-to-day. It doesn't take a terrorist act to
damage our national security—natural disasters alone can do it. We saw
some of this fragility firsthand when Hurricane Katrina knocked refineries
offline and cut down supply in some southeastern states. Georgia Governor Sonny
Perdue
asked schools to take two snow days after Hurricane Rita,
estimating that taking buses off the road for two days would conserve 250,000 gallons of diesel fuel
during a time when national disaster had threatened the nation's fuel supply line.
Increases in driving brought on by
land-use patterns contribute to global warming. The overwhelming
majority of scientists worldwide agree that greenhouse gases and carbon dioxide
(CO2) are linked to the warming of our planet.
Cleaner, more efficient technology for vehicles—though needed and useful—will not be sufficient solutions on their own Increases in fuel efficiency have not been able to keep pace with the increases in driving, resulting in net increases in emissions even as efficiency has improved. Many proposed solutions include plans for renewable energy, lower carbon fuels, or more efficient vehicles—largely overlooking an obvious component: our ever-growing reliance on driving. Consider what's happened in California: the state's ground-breaking CO2 emission standards, under a waiver denied by the EPA, would have resulted in a fleet-wide savings of 27 percent by 2030. But in California, VMT is growing so rapidly that those improvements would be negated by the increases in driving. California leaders are aware that improving efficiency and reducing emissions alone won't fix the problem without an attempt to reduce driving and control sprawling land use. To this end, California senators passed Senate Bill 375, which "set up targets for coordinated planning of transportation, land use and housing with regional reduction targets for greenhouse gases."
According to the legislation, 16% of the proposed
reductions will come from more efficient land uses. After all, what good does it
do to raise mileage standards 10 mpg if everyone has to drive 10 more miles each
day? Smart
growth can reduce the need to drive So rather than hoping technology can catch up with yearly increases in driving, why not just try to make places that don't require so much driving? Compact, mixed-use, interconnected and pedestrian-friendly neighborhoods with transportation choices, a balance of homes, jobs, schools, and other uses can help reduce the need to drive and foster walkability. Areas like these, whether dense city cores or small-town neighborhood streets on a grid, generate less vehicle travel because people drive shorter distances and have to drive less due to the ability to walk or take transit. A Seattle study by Lawrence Frank found that the households located in the most interconnected areas of Seattle generated less than half the driving of households located in the least-connected areas of the region, holding true after adjusting for household size, income and vehicle ownership. An Atlanta study by the same researcher (and others) found that people who live in more walkable neighborhoods —with a mix of housing types and streets that connect to shops, offices and other destinations—drive 30 percent less than those in conventional auto-oriented settings, even when they own the same number of cars at the same rate. In terms of energy consumption, embracing green technologies while living in a sprawling environment still does not match the impact of smart growth. In terms of energy consumption, a “smart location” outperforms even the greenest sprawl house with hybrid cars. (136 million BTU/year vs. 158 milllion BTU/year.) According to a study comissioned by the American Council for an Energy Efficient Economy, shifting just 10% of new U.S. housing starts to smart growth would save 4.95 billion gallons of gasoline, 118 million barrels of oil, 59.5 mmt CO2, and $220 billion in household expenses over 10 years.
Investing in alternative transport modes can reduce driving, emissions, and land and energy consumption A core tenet of smart growth is having access to transportation options. Bus, rail and other forms of public transportation are extremely more efficient than vehicles in reducing consumption, miles traveled, and emissions. We can move more people while also reducing our impact on energy needs and climate through greater investment in public transit. A study by ICF International says that public transportation systems reduce gasoline consumption by a total of 1.4 billion gallons of gasoline each year—the equivalent of a supertanker leaving the Middle East every 11 days. The impact of land use and transportation decisions is easy to see: People who have access to transit, tend to use it—in addition to other modes. People who have access to roads, but no access to transit, tend to drive. A study in the Bay Area by the Metropolitan Transportation Comissiona found that for people who both live and work within half a mile of a rail or ferry stop, 42 percent of them commute by transit. For those who neither work nor live within such proximity, the number falls to 4 percent. Elsewhere, individuals living in higher-density neighborhoods that include convenient access to transit, as well as pedestrian and bicycle-friendly features, reduce their driving by 15 to 50 percent. |