P
R E S S - R E L E A S E
FOR IMMEDIATE
RELEASE
Monday, Nov. 17, 2003 |
CONTACT:
David Goldberg, (202) 412-7930
|
Statement on the occasion of the
“Preserving the American Dream Conference”
Smart
Growth America’s many coalition members and supporters today would
like to welcome the conference organizers to the ongoing conversation
about how to manage growth while improving the quality of life for Americans
of all races and classes.
If the conference lives up to the tone of the questions posed on the
agenda, it will be a refreshing change, indeed. For the last several
years, these same professional nay-sayers have been denying the need
for any new ideas about managing growth, providing transportation choices,
addressing concentrated poverty, expanding housing choices, conserving
important lands and protecting our air and water – much less offering
their own.
Not only that, they have gone to often extreme lengths to smear the
people and organizations who have been making earnest efforts to offer
ideas to improve our cities and towns while continuing to accommodate
economic growth. (For a recent example of this extremism, please see
Wendell Cox’s essay proclaiming Nicolae Ceausescu as the father
of smart growth.)
Today, their conference
brochure (604kb PDF) asks some important questions
(though not necessarily all that should be asked):
•
How do we provide families with the opportunity for the type of home
of their choice, in the area of their choosing and in the price range
they can afford?
• Is there a link between land use and transportation?
• What are the most beneficial housing policies to provide the
economically disadvantaged with a shot at the American Dream?
That
these questions are being asked at this time, by these individuals,
would seem to represent a significant victory for the smart growth movement,
which has been raising these questions for quite some time. For a sampling
of just some of the work being done in these areas is covered on our
web site.
We must note, however, that it seems a bit presumptuous of the men behind
this conference to set themselves up as defenders of ‘the’
American Dream, as if they have a special right to prescribe the one-size-fits-all
dream the rest of us should live by. In this country what people want
most is the freedom to follow their own dreams - and even to change
their aspirations as they progress through various stages of life.
Our coalition members believe that sprawl-as-usual is failing to provide
a full range of options for families, the elderly, low-wage workers
and the poor, even as it is closing off options for future generations,
who deserve to inherit a sound environment, beautiful vistas and vibrant
cities and towns. We strive to change that.
Working with partners in commerce and real estate ñ from local
business organizations like the Silicon Valley Manufacturers Groups
to the professional developers in the Urban Land Institute, to the National
Association of Realtors and Fannie Mae – our coalition members
are committed to finding solutions that are truly market-oriented.
In fact, it has always been mystifying that some self-described defenders
of a free market have been such vociferous defenders of a status quo
that is anything but that. The truth is that today’s system relies
heavily on government subsidies for sprawl-style development, while
over-regulation prohibits the building of walkable, mixed-use neighborhoods
for which there is a clear, unmet demand.
If the organizers of today’s meeting are indeed sincere about
finding solutions that expand our choices in affordable homes in a variety
of convenient neighborhoods; if they really believe in giving people
the freedom of mobility by means of their choosing, whether by car,
bus, train, bike or walking; if they are honest about wanting a free
and fair market, we welcome them to the discussion. We believe that
an intellectually honest evaluation will lead them to similar conclusions,
and that perhaps they will even stop raising false, ad hominem arguments
in defense of a sprawl system that is an affront to their own purported
values.
#
# #
|